Triton XVII, Lot: 144. Estimate $7500. Sold for $13000. This amount does not include the buyer’s fee.

KINGS of MACEDON. Alexander III ‘the Great’. 336-323 BC. AV Distater (21mm, 17.12 g, 8h). Amphipolis mint. Struck under Antipater, circa 325-323/2 BC. Head of Athena right, wearing crested Corinthian helmet decorated with serpent, single-pendant earring, and two necklaces / AΛEΞANΔPOY, Nike standing left, holding wreath in extended right hand and cradling stylis in left arm; vertical thunderbolt in left field, ΛO monogram below left wing. Price 191; Troxell, Studies, group B; Noe, Sicyon, 7 var. (unlisted dies); SNG Alpha Bank 456; SNG München 340; SNG Saroglos 93-4. VF, numerous small marks and scuffs.

From the RAJ Collection, purchased in 2011 from Pegasi.

In conquering the Achaemenid Empire, Alexander III encountered the difficulty of financing his new empire. The collection of taxes and tribute, the payment of Macedonian soldiers and mercenaries, and the continued daily local transactions, all of which had formerly occurred under a complex system of exchange, now occurred within a more standardized system of coinage. Apart from those very few local issues which Alexander himself or his governors continued to strike, this new, so-called “imperial”, coinage consisted of issues in gold, silver, and bronze. Each particular issue featured its own iconography that emphasized the Hellenic nature and mytho-historic importance of the new regime. The vast majority Alexander’s new coinage was struck in silver, namely the tetradrachm and its fractions. Based on the Attic standard, which had been the economic lingua franca of much of the Greek world, these denominations show the head of a young Herakles, the ancestor and patron of the Macedonian royal house, on the obverse, and Zeus Aëtophoros, the king of the Greek pantheon, on the reverse. This 'Alexandrine' type, which was originated by Alexander but continued to be struck long after his death by many of his successors, soon became the accepted international currency during the Hellenistic period. Unlike earlier Greek coinage, these issues were struck at various far-flung mints within the new empire, and the great number of issues is clear evidence of the sizable output of the coinage as a whole, as well as its economic importance.

For a more detailed study of the Alexander coinage, see M. J. Price, The Coinage in the Name of Alexander the Great and Philip Arrhidaeus (London, 1991).