90, Lot: 31. Estimate $150. Sold for $126. This amount does not include the buyer’s fee.

KINGS of PARTHIA. Sinatrukes. 93/2-70/69 BC. AR Drachm (21mm, 4.03 gm). Rhagae mint. Diademed bust left, wearing tiara; neck torque ends in pellet / Arsakes I seated right on throne, holding bow. Sellwood 33.4 (Gotarzes I); Shore 113 (Gotarzes I); BMC Parthia pg. 51, 55 (Phraates III?). Good VF, light toning, slightly weak obverse strike, reverse double struck.

From the Bellaria Collection.

Two Nisa ostraca, Nos. 1760 and 307, reveal that Sinatrukes was the grandson of Phriapatius who in turn was son of the nephew of Arsakes I. Yet, the epithet QEOPATWR on his S33 drachms implies that Sinatrukes must have been son of a deified king. If we take the text of a recently published ostracon, reading “King Arsaces, Great-Grandson of Arsaces”, to be a reference to Mithradates I who, according to the titulature of the S16 drachms of Phraates II, had surely been deified around 128 BC, then Sinatrukes can only have been an adopted son of Mithradates I. The epithet NIKATWR, “Victorious,” on his drachms attest to a great triumph over Mithradates II. Even so, Sinatrukes was soon supplanted in Ekbatana and Rhagae by Gotarzes I, the immediate successor of Mithradates II, then expelled in 88/7 BC from Susa by Mithradates III, and sought refuge among the “Guti” until about 77 BC, when he made a fresh attempt at gaining the Parthian throne.

The absence of both a clear reference to Sinatrukes in the extant Babylonian cuneiform material, and tetradrachms from Seleukeia indicates that he never held Babylonia and had no access to its royal mint. With this in mind, we may safely assign S33 drachms to him, as this emission alone out of the fourteen different “Dark Age” types (S29-41 and S44) lacks parallel tetradrachms.