Classic Flavian Portrait

Sale: Triton X, Lot: 603. Estimate $1500.  Closing Date: Monday, 8 January 2007.  Sold For $1500. This amount does not include the buyer’s fee.

Julia Titi. Augusta, AD 79-90/1. Æ Dupondius (13.23 g, 6h). Uncertain Balkan mint. Struck under Titus, circa AD 80-81. IVLIA IMP T AVG F AVGVSTA, draped bust right / CERES AVGVST, S C across field, Ceres standing left, holding two grain ears in right hand, scepter in left. RIC II 177 (Titus); RPC II 509; H. Cahn, "An Imperial Mint in Bithynia," INJ 8 (1984-5), 9; BMCRE 255; BN 266 (Titus); Cohen 2. VF, green-brown patina. Attractive classic Flavian portrait.

Ex Gemini I (11 January 2005), lot 341.

Based on subtle stylistic differences from the typical Rome mint issues, this series was originally given to Lugdunum by Mattingly in BMCRE. Later scholarship, though, concluded that Lugdunum closed long before the Flavian period. I. Carradice, based on the close stylistic affinity of these to the regular Roman issues, opted for a separate officina at Rome (Coinage and Finance in the Reign of Domitian, BAR International Series 178, pp. 118-21). Hahn disagreed, and placed them at an unknown mint in Bithynia. Analyzing the extant examples, he noted that many existed in the museum in Istanbul, whereas none are known in the west. Furthermore, he also noted that all of the types in this Latin series were employed on the local provincial coinages of Bithynia, too. Carradice and Cowell (NC 1987, p. 49), though, noted that the metal content of the Latin and Bithynian issues were consistently different, as were their die axes. Burnett reexamined Hahn's analysis, and also noted a few problems: that in addition to Istanbul the coins were prevalent in museums throughout the Balkans, and that the provincial Bithynian issues were struck later than the Latin issues. Nonetheless, he also noted several stylistic variations and differences in the flans from the standard Rome mint coins, discounting a possible separate officina. Furthermore, he noted similarities with the Latin coinage of Nero and the provincial issues that were struck in Perinthus (RPC II pp. 87-88). Although he could not say for certain that the mint was Perinthus, he concluded that the mint was likely located in the Balkan region.